Difference between revisions of "User talk:Puppy101"
m |
m (→Sure) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{usertalk}} | {{usertalk}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[ | + | == [[User:Tzar|Tzar]] 17:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC) == |
| − | + | You're a wiki making machine | |
| − | : | + | :ahahahah no, people are just lazy! |
| − | + | ::you didn't timestamp your reply! I'm hurt. Also, there's something a little bit wrong with the honour page :p | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[ | + | CGI Error |
| + | The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. | ||
| + | [[User:Bishop|Bishop]] 15:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | == Sure == | |
| − | + | Most of the time, I'm just taking information already there, or information around the wiki and trying to put it in comprehensible format. In that case, I think that modification came from trying to understand Bishop's main "mystics" page and put the relevant information on WPA. As I said in discussion, it's horrible writing and it should all be removed. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Also don't be annoying with lame edits like | |
| − | |||
| − | [[ | + | ===Self Spells=== |
| − | + | Mod WPA has <b>NO</b> effect on the success of self spells. The success of self spells are determined by the percentage of [[Buildings#Guilds|Guilds]] which you run, to a certain cap value. | |
| − | [[ | + | ===Duration of Spells=== |
| + | Mod WPA has <b>NO</b> effect on the duration of spells (both self spells and offensive ones). The duration of spells are dependent on the percentage of [[Buildings#Guilds|Guilds]] which you run, to a certain cap value. | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | It should suffice to say "WPA does not influence spell duration", as it should suffice to say "WPA does not influence the success-rate of self spells." Please refrain from using such profanity in your edits. | |
| − | + | --[[User:Stupid|Stupid]] 20:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 01:42, 24 January 2010
| This is the UtopiaWIKI User talk page for Puppy101, where you can send messages and comments to Puppy101. |
|
|
Tzar 17:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
You're a wiki making machine
- ahahahah no, people are just lazy!
- you didn't timestamp your reply! I'm hurt. Also, there's something a little bit wrong with the honour page :p
CGI Error The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. Bishop 15:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Sure
Most of the time, I'm just taking information already there, or information around the wiki and trying to put it in comprehensible format. In that case, I think that modification came from trying to understand Bishop's main "mystics" page and put the relevant information on WPA. As I said in discussion, it's horrible writing and it should all be removed.
Also don't be annoying with lame edits like
Self Spells
Mod WPA has NO effect on the success of self spells. The success of self spells are determined by the percentage of Guilds which you run, to a certain cap value.
Duration of Spells
Mod WPA has NO effect on the duration of spells (both self spells and offensive ones). The duration of spells are dependent on the percentage of Guilds which you run, to a certain cap value.
It should suffice to say "WPA does not influence spell duration", as it should suffice to say "WPA does not influence the success-rate of self spells." Please refrain from using such profanity in your edits.
--Stupid 20:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
