Difference between revisions of "Talk:Exploring, Construction & Building Formulas"
(→Algebra is FUN: new section) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
(.5 * %Filled Jobs + 50) + Science + Race + Stance + Dragon (Dragon already has negative stats, subtracting a negative stat makes it positive) | (.5 * %Filled Jobs + 50) + Science + Race + Stance + Dragon (Dragon already has negative stats, subtracting a negative stat makes it positive) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Algebra is FUN == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Base Effect * BE * % of building * (1 - % of building) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm assuming this translates as | ||
+ | |||
+ | BE * Effect | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now N(1-N) is... wrong. N(1-N) says that after 50% of a building type you start losing the effects that building has... let alone it doesn't seem to follow any | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | So... Lets do this Right (With PAINFUL Spreadsheets!) |
Revision as of 22:36, 21 November 2009
Exploration Costs
Formula requires work for both the GC + Soldier Costs. Puppy101 08:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Building Efficency
The current formula makes no logical sense,
[(Current Available Workers) / 2]
((2/3) * Total Jobs + 1) * Science + Race + Stance - Dragon
Even if you fix that * Sign and move the modifiers out, it doesn't account for a surplus of workers, and the +1 looks more like a "can't divide by 0" fudge factor. (That also means you can't have 100%)
If, by chance, the 1/2 current available workers means that for every 2% employment drop you have a 1% Building Efficiency drop, then you need to add 50 at the end of the equation
(.5 * %Filled Jobs + 50) + Science + Race + Stance + Dragon (Dragon already has negative stats, subtracting a negative stat makes it positive)
Algebra is FUN
Base Effect * BE * % of building * (1 - % of building)
I'm assuming this translates as
BE * Effect
Now N(1-N) is... wrong. N(1-N) says that after 50% of a building type you start losing the effects that building has... let alone it doesn't seem to follow any
So... Lets do this Right (With PAINFUL Spreadsheets!)